Almost Perfect

I don't believe that anything in this temporal world which we live in is perfect but this specimen of manhood is as close to perfection as anyone can get.

Please don't be mistaken, he is by no means the standard by which I measure myself or my potential partners. Far be it. He is at best, a 2-dimensional representation of a multi-dimensional human being and while he certainly looks good in 2-dimensions (and most likely in 3-D), the rest of him as a human being is a big unknown.

While he has many of the physical attributes which I find attractive in a man, each of these on their own by no means makes him attractive per se.

Non-physical attributes are just as important to me , if not more important as these tend to have a more permanent quality than physical attributes which will deteriorate with age more quickly than the non-physical attributes even though the latter sometimes also deteriorates with age or other circumstances.

I'm still no closer to answering the question which I posed in an earlier post as to what it is exactly I find attractive in a man.

Actually, this is more of a secondary question. The primary question should be what it is that makes men more attractive to me than women.

I think there are persuasive arguments on both sides in the nature v nurture debate and like most things, the truth, such as it is, is usually somewhere in between.

For the cynics amongst my readers, you might well be thinking that all this introspection is merely an excuse to post a picture of a naked man with an erection.

Seeing as this is my blog and I can post whatever I like (within the limits set by Blogger), I can gratuitously post pictures of cute, naked men, erect or otherwise without any of this self-indulgent navel-gazing drivel. If it's just the pictures you're after, feel free to skip the drivel. I won't be offended in the least.